1960 Ford Falcon vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Falcon | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Falcon | Kangoo |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 64 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2630 mm |
