1960 Ford Falcon vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rover 75 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Falcon | 2005 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Falcon | 75 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2750 mm |
