1960 Ford Zodiac vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1976 Volvo 66 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ford Zodiac (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 371 kg more than 1976 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Zodiac | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Zodiac | 66 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1390 mm |
