1960 Holden FC vs. 1964 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 1964 Isuzu Minx is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Holden FC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 62 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 50 kg more than 1960 Holden FC.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Holden FC (150 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1960 Holden FC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Holden FC | 1964 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Holden | Isuzu |
Model | FC | Minx |
Year Released | 1960 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2440 mm |