1960 Holden FC vs. 1992 Renault Clio

To start off, 1992 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Holden FC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Holden FC (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1992 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Holden FC should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Holden FC weights approximately 170 kg more than 1992 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Holden FC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Holden FC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Holden FC (150 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Clio. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1960 Holden FC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications: