1960 Lotus Elite vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 450 kg more than 1960 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Lotus Elite | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | Elite | Clio |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1214 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2750 mm |