1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass (150 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass (249 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Nissan Cedric | 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Cedric | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3135 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 249 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2720 mm |
