1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 1998 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 1998 Suzuki Grand Vitara is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Suzuki Grand Vitara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Suzuki Grand Vitara (86 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Suzuki Grand Vitara should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Suzuki Grand Vitara (216 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1998 Suzuki Grand Vitara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Nissan Cedric | 1998 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | Cedric | Grand Vitara |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2490 mm |
