1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS (397 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 337 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS (601 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 485 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Nissan | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Cedric | CLS |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 601 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |