1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1960 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 500 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Toyota Master RR | 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Toyota | Mitsubishi |
Model | Master RR | Minica |
Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 657 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2350 mm |