1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,190 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier (120 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 19 kg more than 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier | |
| Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
| Model | Master RR | Cavalier |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2190 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 120 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1191 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 57 L |
