1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2012 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2012 Dodge Ram is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Ram (345 HP) has 305 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Ram weights approximately 481 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 2012 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Toyota | Dodge |
| Model | Master RR | Ram |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 5654 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 345 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1691 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 6350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 4080 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 132 L |
