1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2013 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2013 Nissan Cube is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Cube (120 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Cube weights approximately 62 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Toyota Master RR | 2013 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Toyota | Nissan |
Model | Master RR | Cube |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1800 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 120 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1272 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |