1961 AC Aceca vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1961 AC Aceca. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 691 kg more than 1961 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 AC Aceca | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Aceca | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6550 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 213 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2960 mm |
