1961 AC Greyhound vs. 1950 Allard K1
To start off, 1961 AC Greyhound is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1950 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K1 weights approximately 52 kg more than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1950 Allard K1 (203 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1950 Allard K1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Greyhound | 1950 Allard K1 | |
Make | AC | Allard |
Model | Greyhound | K1 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 203 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1067 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 113 L |