1961 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2007 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1961 Aston Martin DBR2. (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1961 Aston Martin DBR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2007 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
| Model | DBR2 | STS |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4164 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 64 L |
