1961 Austin A vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1961 Austin A. (38 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 719 kg more than 1961 Austin A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A. (87 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1864 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |