1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 1973 Chrysler 160
To start off, 1973 Chrysler 160 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (108 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1025 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 1973 Chrysler 160 | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | 62 | 160 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1981 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 91.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |