1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Ford F-150
To start off, 2012 Ford F-150 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-150 (360 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford F-150 weights approximately 243 kg more than 1961 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | F-150 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 360 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2012 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 98 L |