1961 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2000 Volvo V40
To start off, 2000 Volvo V40 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP) has 231 more horse power than 2000 Volvo V40. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo V40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 520 kg more than 2000 Volvo V40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo V40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Ford Thunderbird | 2000 Volvo V40 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Thunderbird | V40 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6638 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 339 HP | 108 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |
