1961 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1961 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 450 kg more than 1961 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander (226 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Nissan | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Cedric | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 166 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1535 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4665 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2670 mm |
