1962 AC Aceca vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1284 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Aceca | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | AC | Cadillac |
| Model | Aceca | 62 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 79 L |
