1962 AC Aceca vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Aceca (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda 626 weights approximately 311 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Aceca (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1962 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Aceca | 626 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2620 mm |