1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 1990 Renault Clio is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1990 Renault Clio. (79 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 AC Greyhound weights approximately 175 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (107 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1990 Renault Clio | |
Make | AC | Renault |
Model | Greyhound | Clio |
Year Released | 1962 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 107 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |