1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Daihatsu Move
To start off, 2000 Daihatsu Move is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2000 Daihatsu Move. (53 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2000 Daihatsu Move. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 AC Greyhound weights approximately 200 kg more than 2000 Daihatsu Move. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daihatsu Move. (90 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daihatsu Move.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2000 Daihatsu Move | |
Make | AC | Daihatsu |
Model | Greyhound | Move |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 90 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 37 L |