1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2004 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (195 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1351 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (353 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2004 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Greyhound | Express |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 353 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2366 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 6210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 2090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3940 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 117 L |