1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (83 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (121 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | AC | Smart |
Model | Greyhound | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 121 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 1870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 33 L |