1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2003 Peugeot 206
To start off, 2003 Peugeot 206 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Peugeot 206 (108 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Peugeot 206 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Peugeot 206 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Peugeot 206, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Peugeot 206 (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Peugeot 206 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2003 Peugeot 206 | |
Make | Austin | Peugeot |
Model | A 60 | 206 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1580 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 47 L |