1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,487 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 60 | Micra |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 46 L |
