1962 Austin A 99 vs. 1975 Sunbeam Alpine

To start off, 1975 Sunbeam Alpine is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 99 (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1975 Sunbeam Alpine. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1975 Sunbeam Alpine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1975 Sunbeam Alpine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Sunbeam Alpine. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Sunbeam Alpine.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 99 1975 Sunbeam Alpine
Make Austin Sunbeam
Model A 99 Alpine
Year Released 1962 1975
Engine Size 2912 cc 1725 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 110 HP 71 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 123 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1010 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2510 mm