1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 182 kg more than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer (197 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (167 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Austin-Healey Mitsubishi
Model 3000 Mk II Lancer
Year Released 1962 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 2360 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 16 cylinders
Engine Type in-line single
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 129 HP 166 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 197 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Electric
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Single Speed
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1158 kg 1340 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 4585 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1505 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2635 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]