1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 1997 Acura CL is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura CL (200 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1997 Acura CL.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Acura CL | |
| Make | Cadillac | Acura |
| Model | 62 | CL |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2715 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 65 L |
