1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Audi Q7
To start off, 2011 Audi Q7 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi Q7 (493 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Because 2011 Audi Q7 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi Q7 (1,000 Nm) has 418 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Cadillac 62. (582 Nm). This means 2011 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Audi Q7 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Audi |
| Model | 62 | Q7 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 5394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 493 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 1000 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5088 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1737 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3002 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 100 L |
