1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2005 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Land Rover Freelander. (240 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Land Rover Freelander.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2005 Land Rover Freelander | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | Sixty | Freelander |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 174 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |