1962 DAF 750 vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 1989 Mazda 323 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,324 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda 323 (74 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Mazda 323 weights approximately 323 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Mazda 323 (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1989 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 750 | 323 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 57 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2620 mm |