1962 DAF 750 vs. 2010 Pontiac G6
To start off, 2010 Pontiac G6 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Pontiac G6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Pontiac G6 (219 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Pontiac G6 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Pontiac G6 weights approximately 892 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Pontiac G6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Pontiac G6 (297 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Pontiac G6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 2010 Pontiac G6 | |
Make | DAF | Pontiac |
Model | 750 | G6 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 219 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 297 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 87.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 94.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1554 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2860 mm |