1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 1966 DKW Munga
To start off, 1966 DKW Munga is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 978 cc (3 cylinders), 1966 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 DKW Munga (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DKW Munga weights approximately 445 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF Daffodil | 1966 DKW Munga | |
Make | DAF | DKW |
Model | Daffodil | Munga |
Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 31 L |