1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 2013 Audi A7
To start off, 2013 Audi A7 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Audi A7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Audi A7 (414 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 388 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Audi A7 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Audi A7 weights approximately 1280 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Audi A7 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Audi A7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Audi A7 (549 Nm) has 496 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm). This means 2013 Audi A7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF Daffodil | 2013 Audi A7 | |
Make | DAF | Audi |
Model | Daffodil | A7 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | single |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 414 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 53 Nm | 549 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2139 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1408 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2914 mm |