1962 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | DKW | Holden |
| Model | Munga | HRT |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
