1962 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2000 Pontiac Firebird is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,784 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pontiac Firebird (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Pontiac Firebird weights approximately 395 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Pontiac Firebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 2000 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | DKW | Pontiac |
Model | Munga | Firebird |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 3784 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 96.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 58 L |