1962 DKW Munga vs. 2001 Ford 49
To start off, 2001 Ford 49 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,899 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford 49 (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford 49 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford 49 weights approximately 188 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford 49. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2001 Ford 49 | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | 49 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 3899 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1298 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2620 mm |
