1962 DKW Munga vs. 2006 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (345 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 302 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 659 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 2006 Dodge Ram | |
Make | DKW | Dodge |
Model | Munga | Ram |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1769 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 2050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 132 L |