1962 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Fiat Bravo (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 325 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Fiat Bravo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2009 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | DKW | Fiat |
| Model | Munga | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 1956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 90.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 57 L |
