1962 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Cube (120 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan Cube. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | DKW | Nissan |
| Model | Munga | Cube |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 120 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 82 L |
