1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2011 Nissan Cube

To start off, 2011 Nissan Cube is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Cube. (122 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Cube. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 610 kg more than 2011 Nissan Cube. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Ford Thunderbird 2011 Nissan Cube
Make Ford Nissan
Model Thunderbird Cube
Year Released 1962 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6964 cc 1800 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 345 HP 122 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1875 kg 1265 kg
Vehicle Length 5210 mm 3980 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1694 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1651 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2530 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 50 L