1962 Holden EK vs. 2001 Acura CL
To start off, 2001 Acura CL is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,212 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura CL (260 HP) has 196 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura CL (315 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2001 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2001 Acura CL | |
| Make | Holden | Acura |
| Model | EK | CL |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 260 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 315 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
