1962 Holden EK vs. 2003 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2003 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan Pathfinder (238 HP) has 174 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan Pathfinder (360 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2003 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2003 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | EK | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 238 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
