1962 Holden EK vs. 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward
To start off, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP) has 258 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (490 Nm) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | |
Make | Holden | Rolls-Royce |
Model | EK | Park Ward |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 5379 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 322 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 490 Nm |