1962 Holden EK vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP) has 492 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm) has 582 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Holden | Cadillac |
| Model | EK | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 556 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 746 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
