1962 Holden EK vs. 2010 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Mustang (315 HP) has 251 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Mustang (440 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2010 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Holden | Ford |
| Model | EK | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 315 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
